Directions(1-2): Reading Comprehension (including questions on antonym and synonyms)
Sure, everyone wants to be happy. But what kind of happiness do people want? Is it happiness experienced moment-to-moment? Or is it being able to look back and remember a time as happy? Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman described this distinction as “being happy in your life” versus “being happy about your life.” Take a moment to ask yourself, which happiness are you seeking? This might seem like a needless delineation; after all, a time experienced as happy is often also remembered as happy. An evening spent with good friends over good food and wine will be experienced and remembered happily. Similarly, an interesting project staffed with one’s favorite colleagues will be fun to work on and look back on. But the two don’t always go hand in hand. A weekend spent relaxing in front of the TV will be experienced as happy at the moment, but that time won’t be memorable and may even usher feelings of guilt in hindsight. A day at the zoo with one’s young children may involve many frustrating moments, but a singular moment of delight will make that day a happy memory. A week of late nights stuck at the office, while not fun exactly, will make one feel satisfied in hindsight if it results in a major achievement.
While happiness scholars have long grappled with which form of happiness should be measured and pursued, nobody has simply asked people which version of happiness they seek. But if we want to find ways to be happy, it may help to understand what type of happiness we truly want. In a series of studies, recently published in The Journal of Positive Psychology, we directly asked thousands of people (ages 18 to 81) about their preference between experienced and remembered happiness. We found that people’s preferences differed according to the length of time they were considering — and according to their culture. For Westerners, the happiness most people said they wanted for the next day was different from the happiness they said they wanted for their lifetime, even though one’s days add up to one’s life. We found this interesting; if people make decisions by the hour, they may end up with a different version of happiness than what they say they want for their life.
In one study, we asked 1,145 Americans to choose between experienced happiness (“where you experience happiness on a moment-to-moment basis”) and remembered happiness(“where afterward you will reflect back and feel happy”) for either a longer timeframe (i.e., their life overall or next year) or a shorter timeframe (i.e., their next day or hour). The majority of participants chose experienced happiness over remembered happiness when choosing for their life (79%) or their next year (65%). By contrast, there was a roughly even split of participants who chose experienced happiness and remembered happiness when choosing what they wanted for their next hour (49%) or day (48%). This pattern of results was not affected by individuals’ overall happiness, impulsivity, age, household income, marital status, or parental status. After participants made their choices, we asked them to write a short paragraph explaining why. We found that those who favored experienced happiness mostly expressed a belief in carpediem: a philosophy that one should seize the present moment because the future is uncertain and life is short. On the other hand, participants’ explanations for choosing remembered happiness ranged from a desire for longer-lasting happiness to a nostalgic treasuring of memories, to the motivation to achieve in order to feel productive and proud. So people became more philosophical when asked to consider longer time periods like their life overall, and they reported wanting more happiness experienced in the moment. But when they thought about the next day or hour, it was as though a Puritan work ethic emerged — more people seemed to be willing to forfeit those moments of happiness, to put the work in now to be able to look back later and feel happy. This willingness is necessary, of course, during certain periods of life. But defaulting to it too often may lead to missing out on experiencing happiness. Those unseized moments add up, and together they may go against what many believe constitutes a happy life.
We conducted a few more studies to test the robustness of our results. In one study, we gave people different definitions of remembered happiness to see if a particular portrayal was
driving the result. In another, we varied how soon the hour was that they were considering (“one hour today” vs. “one hour toward the end of your life”) to see if imminence and perhaps
impatience played a role in people’s preferences. In both cases, these treatments didn’t change the pattern we saw: when choosing for their life, most people chose experienced happiness over remembered happiness; but when choosing for an hour, half chose remembered happiness.
Paragraph 5 :
Last, we wanted to test whether the pattern we saw among all of our American participants generalized to other cultures. We presented the same choice between experienced and remembered happiness, for either their next hour or for their life, to approximately 400 people in other Western countries (England and the Netherlands) and 400 in Eastern countries (China and Japan). As Americans, when choosing for their life, the majority of Europeans (65%) chose experienced happiness over remembered happiness; but when choosing for their next hour, the Puritan work ethic appeared even more strongly with a majority (62%) choosing remembered happiness over experienced happiness. In contrast, Easterners’ preferred happiness persisted across timeframes. The majority of Easterners chose experienced happiness over remembered happiness regardless of whether choosing for their life (81%) or their next hour (84%). Why this consistency? We believe that participants in China and Japan were more clear in their preference for experienced happiness due to the long religious history in Eastern cultures of teaching the value of mindfulness and appreciating each present moment.
Our studies asked thousands of individuals which of two types of happiness—experienced or remembered—they preferred. We found that the answer depends on whether people are considering the short pieces of their life or their life overall, and where they’re from. Though the pursuit of happiness is so fundamental as to be called an inalienable right, the particular form of happiness individuals pursue is surprisingly malleable. It’s important to note that while this research helps us understand people’s beliefs about which happiness is preferable, it does not prescribe which form of happiness would be better to pursue. But these results reveal that Westerners planning their lives by the day or the hour will likely achieve a different version of happiness than what they themselves believe makes a happy life. We’re all too busy, and we’re driven to turn down opportunities to constantly feel happy. But if you believe you want a life of happiness experienced at the moment, think twice before preventing yourself from achieving it.
1. What is the theme of the passage?
A. he claims would have been
B. Happiness in westerners
C. Happiness in Americans
D. What happiness you value most experienced or remembered?
E. Experienced happiness
: Option C
: As the author tries to differentiate between experienced and remembered happiness and tried to work on it (Option c) is appropriate title for the passage.
2. What is the tone of Passage?
D. Both A & B
E. All of these
: Option D
: As the author explained his views with some examples of analysis and also Inhibited some limited and doubtful characteristics Option D will be appropriate title for the passage.
Directions(3-4): In the following passage some of the words have been left out, each of which is indicated by a number. Find the suitable word from the options given against each number and fill up the blanks with appropriate words to make the paragraph grammatically and meaningfully complete.
Almost three decades after the ____(3)____ of economic reforms, India’s mainstream political parties are increasingly speaking the same language on welfare. The new political positioning of the BJP stands in contrast to its earlier belief that growth is the best antidote to poverty. This apparent shift may be born out of pragmatism and the fear of ceding space to its challengers. Whatever be the reason, the kind of competing for welfarism that is now on show is certain to distress sections of economic policy-makers, industry, and investors. But it is also a signpost of India’s political economy at work and a reflection of the ____(4)____ fact that irrespective of the color and stability of the regime, the direction of reform hinge on political will. Sure, there have been structural reforms over the last decade or more across governments. But there is also a clear Laxman Rekha that the mainstream national parties seem to have drawn.
E. Both A & B
: Option C
: Correct alternative as unveiling means the removal of a veil or covering from a new monument or work of art as part of a public ceremony.
E. none of the above
: Option B
: Correct alternative as sobering means creating a more serious, sensible, or solemn mood.
Desiccate means having had all moisture removed; dried out.
Ameliorating means make (something bad or unsatisfactory) better.
Skeptical means not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations.
5. It has been proved beyond reasonable doubt that the planning of the attack originated from the foreign earth.
A. Foreign space
B. Foreign soil
C. Foreign sky
D. Foreign waters
E. No replacement required
: Option B
: The given sentence implies that the planning of the attack originated from the foreign countries and this has also been proved beyond any doubt. In the given sentence, the error is in the phrase used to denote foreign country or land since foreign soil is used for that purpose and not foreign earth as used in the sentence.