Directions Q (1-10):
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most suitable options for the questions given below:
As campuses across the U.S. open their doors to new students, fresh out of high school, the conversation is dominated by issues of diversity, free speech and safe spaces. Some people hold that we need to take care not to offend others, to create spaces where everyone not only feels safe, but is also valued and respected. Others hold that education is about being exposed to and dealing with a wide range of information, ideas and opinions, some of which we may find disagreeable or even offensive.
In the first scenario, it is expected that we watch what we say and how we say it, and any potentially offensive material is introduced with a
“trigger warning”, indicating that it could hurt the sentiments of certain people. So an article about the refugee crisis might be potentially disturbing to people who have themselves been through such an experience, or a film that deals with suicide could affect someone who either attempted it or knows someone who has. The spirit behind this approach is to increase sensitivity to difference and to be reflective about how everything we say and do could be interpreted by those who come from backgrounds that may be different from ours.
Many institutions have put in place (or are now designing) orientation programmes for their students and faculty that gets them to recognize the multiple ways in which we might offend or hurt by our words, gestures and actions.
Many have criticized this approach for taking things too far, for having a “chilling” effect — making people so worried about offending that they end up not saying anything, not offering honest criticism, or masking their true responses with political correctness. A recent statement by the president of a university emphasized that campuses should be spaces of free speech and debate, implying that over-use of trigger warnings could discourage true dialogue, and worse, would result in students not being exposed to a range of viewpoints. Others, similarly, have warned that too much of an emphasis on this kind of “safety” would not build the ability to engage with and resolve differences — something that is important in today’s
polarized world.
In India, too, we have had our share of back-and-forth on the right to offend and the right to take offence. Few would disagree that we need to develop awareness of and sensitivity to differences of various kinds — sexual, social, cultural and political. At the same time, we also need to develop the ability to talk through things we do not understand completely or what we do not agree with. Before dismissing a point of view we need to engage with it—and this means running the risk of being displeased, angered or even offended.
College is the perfect place to do this. For the first time, as young adults, we have the opportunity to interact with people who may be very different from ourselves. It is an opportunity to understand this difference, to explore from the bottom up, to ask questions about it, and then figure out where we stand in relation to it. Understanding people and becoming aware of their experiences is one thing. Understanding their ideas and the reasoning behind their actions is another. It is important to distinguish between the two and to cultivate both kinds of understanding.
Once we leave college, we tend to interact with a fairly homogeneous group of people — family, workplace acquaintances, a few neighbors — who all look and think like us. Universities, particularly public universities, on the other hand, expose us to people from different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds.
We can have “trigger warnings” at the back of our minds and talk to people carefully to begin with, trying to figure out what makes them vulnerable and managing our interactions in a way that builds on acceptance rather than suspicion. The questions we ask and answer at this stage revolve around: “Who are you (as defined by the person)?” “What are your experiences?” “What makes you tick?” “What are your fears and hopes?” From here we go on to: “What do you think of...?” “Why do you hold that position?” The underlying spirit all through this questioning is to understand, not to challenge or attack. Once understanding has been established, the space naturally becomes safe for further intellectual dialogue that is open and free ranging.
Safe spaces cannot be built on the basis of restricting speech. They can only emerge over time from a process of real dialogue.
1. What are the views of other people about education?
A. It deals with a wide range of information, ideas and opinions, some of which we may find disagreeable or even offensive.
B. It creates spaces where everyone not only feels safe, but is also valued and respected.
C. Education is the fundamental right of every girl child
D. Both A and B
E. Both B and C
Answer: Option A
Solution: In paragraph one, it is written education is about being exposed to and dealing with a wide range of information, ideas and opinions.
2. What is the underlying spirit for making safe space for intellectual dialogue?
A. To worried about offending
B. To develop the ability to talk through things
C. To develop awareness of and sensitivity to differences of various kinds
D. To understand, not to challenge or attack.
E. None of these
Answer: Option D
Solution: In the last paragraph, underlying spirit is to understand, not to challenge or attack
3. What was the statement made by the president for ‘campuses’?
A. He says that we need to take care not to offend others, to create spaces where everyone not only feels safe, but is also valued and respected.
B. He warned that too much of an emphasis on this kind of “safety” would not build the ability to engage with and resolve differences
C. Campuses should be spaces of free speech and debate, implying that over-use of trigger warnings could discourage true dialogue, and worse, would result in students not being exposed to a range of viewpoints.
D. Both B and C
E. None of these
Answer: Option C
Solution: President says that Campuses should be spaces of free speech and debate, implying that over- use of trigger warnings could discourage true dialogue, and worse, would result in students not being exposed to a range of viewpoints.
4. What are the sections in which we needed to bring awareness in India?
A. Political knowledge
B. Cultural knowledge
C. Social knowledge
D. Sexual knowledge
E. All of the above
Answer: Option E
Solution: Awareness to bring in India in political, cultural, social and sexual knowledge.
5. Which of the following is true as per the passage?
A. Safe spaces can be built on the basis of restricting speech.
B. Understanding people and becoming aware of their experiences is two different things.
C. Some people hold that we need to take care to offend others, to create spaces where everyone not only feels safe, but is also valued and respected.
D. Universities, particularly public universities, on the other hand, do not expose us to people from different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds.
E. None of the these
Answer: Option E
Solution: all the statement given is wrong in the context of the passage.
6. Which of the following is false as per the passage?
A. They can only emerge over time from a process of real dialogue.
B. Before dismissing a point of view we need to engage with it—and this means running the risk of being displeased, angered or even offended.
C. Safe spaces can be built on the basis of restricting speech.
D. All of the above
E. None of these
Answer: Option C
Solution: option (c) is wrong, correct sentence is ‘safe spaces cannot be built on the basis of restricting speech’.
7. Which of the following word can replace the word polarized?
A. Demarcated
B. Parallel
C. Diluted
D. Connected
E. None of these
Answer: Option A
Solution: ‘polarized’ and ‘demarcated’ are same in meaning as per the context of the passage.
8. Which of the following determines the correct meaning of phrase ‘a chilling effect’?
A. A situation where speech or conduct is suppressed by fear of penalization at the interests of an individual or group
B. The apparent temperature felt on exposed skin, which is a function of the air temperature and wind speed
C. A shocking effect that is not understands by peoples.
D. All of the above
E None of these
Answer: Option A
Solution: A chilling effect means a situation where speech or conduct is suppressed by fear of penalization at the interests of an individual or group.
9. Which of the following is the meaning of ‘trigger warning’?
A. A potentially offensive material
B. A alarm warning machine
C. A unaltered situation
D. A limit of differences between gestures of people
E. None of these
Answer: Option A
Solution: As written in the paragraph ‘trigger warning’ is a potentially offensive material’.
10. What are the steps taken by the institutes to reduce trigger warning?
A. A committee has been set up to evoke measures to reduce the consequence of it.
B. Awareness about fundamental rights is given to each students and faculty members.
C. Designed an orientation programmes for their students and faculty that gets them to recognize the multiple ways in which we might offend or hurt by our words, gestures and actions.
D. Both A and C
E. Both B and C
Answer: Option C
Solution: The institutes will design an orientation programmes for their students.......