Directions (1-3): Read the following Comprehension and answer the questions.
Consecutive prison terms for those convicted of more than one offense in a single trial are infrequent in India. When those who have attracted great public odium by the enormity of their crimes are found guilty, the judges are seen to have the option of awarding sentences that are ‘consecutive’, to be undergone one after another as opposed to concurrently, where the longest jail term subsumes the shorter ones. On rare occasions, for example in the case of self-proclaimed godman Premananda in Tamil Nadu, two life sentences have been ordered to run consecutively. The Supreme Court has now provided clarity on the question of whether two or more sentences of life imprisonment can be made to run one after another. It is basically irrational and anomalous, says the Constitution Bench. As life imprisonment is for the remainder of one’s life, unless ended by remission or commutation, multiple life terms should be counted concurrently. Accordingly, judgments that run contrary to this principle have been overruled. Consecutive sentences are still permissible if one is a fixed term and the other is one of life, provided the term sentence is completed first and the life sentence begins later.
Unbelievably lengthy prison sentences are not common in India, unlike in some jurisdictions in the West. However, most of these countries balance it with a robust system of probation or parole. On the other hand, the idea of releasing a prisoner under supervised probation after a part of the sentence has been served is still rare in India; both state and society expect convicts to be imprisoned for as long as possible. This highlights an issue that occasionally crops up in judicial discourse: the absence of sentencing guidelines in India. In theory, sentences can be deterrent, retributive, reformative or restorative. However, the present sentencing paradigm is judge-centric, leaving much to the court’s discretion. Some believe this may be right because no two offenses, or even offenders, are likely to be the same. Circumstances (aggravating or mitigating), motive and nature of the crime are all taken into account by judges in sentencing. For heinous crimes, the ideas of deterrence and retribution inform judicial discretion, and hence the more popular verdicts are those that award condign punishment. Until sentencing guidelines are framed by the legislature or the superior judiciary, individual judges will have to carry the burden of awarding punishment that befits the crime. By holding that there shall be no consecutive life terms, the court has offered a ray of hope to even those locked away for life, even if it may not guarantee release. For, justice ultimately cannot be merely retributive.
1. What according to the passage both state and society expect?
A. the longest jail term subsumes the shorter ones
B. Consecutive prison terms for those convicted of more than one offense in a single trial should not be infrequent in India
C. balance it with a robust system of probation or parole
D. the convicts should be imprisoned for as long as possible
E. None of the above
Answer - Option D
Explanation - the convicts should be imprisoned for as long as possible.
2. Which among the following is not TRUE according to the passage given above?
A. one offence in a single trial are infrequent in India
B. the idea of releasing a prisoner under supervised probation after a part of the sentence has been served is still frequent in India
C. most of the countries balance it with a robust system of probation or parole
D. Circumstances , motive and nature of the crime are all taken into account by judges in sentencing
E. None of the above
Answer - Option B
Explanation - the idea of releasing a prisoner under supervised probation after a part of the sentence has been served is still frequent in India
3. How according to the passage two life sentences can be run consecutively?
A. two or more sentences of life imprisonment cannot be made to run one after another
B. two or more sentences of life imprisonment can be made together
C. two or more sentences of life imprisonment can be made to run one after another
D. Both A and C
E. All of the above
Answer - Option C
Explanation - two or more sentences of life imprisonment can be made to run one after another
Directions (3-5): In each of the following questions, a sentence is written in four different ways conveying some meaning and following or may not following the correct grammar structure. Choose the sentence among the four options which is grammatically correct. If there is no error in any of the sentences, choose (e), i.e. “All are correct” as the answer
4.
A. In life, we play many roles but there is one principal role that we share in common that is to be the best human being possible.
B. The common role we play in life is to be best human being possible.
C. Role is played by us in life which is principle in ways other than common.
D. Best human being is a principle played by everyone in life so as to become a common man.
E. All are correct
Answer - Option A
Explanation - Option A is suitable.
5.
A. Channelising energy is needed for stability to prevail in form of peace and harmony.
B. Peace and harmony needs to be channelize in the way of stability to form.
C. Crucial role played to channelise energy is needed for peace and harmony.
D. For stability, peace and harmony to prevail, it is crucial to channelise one’s energy towards constructive actions.
E. All are correct
Answer - Option D
Explanation - Option D is suitable.