Generally the problems in analysing arguments have one or two arguments with a statement. Out of two arguments, the candidate has to find out which is strong argument and which is weak argument.

Statement is concerned with three topics like political, social, economic followed by two arguments that are in favour or against the statement. Also arguments that are strong or weak. In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Common features of strong arguments: 1. Universal truth: It means that if an argument is scientifically established or universally accepted fact then it is strong and cannot be denied. 2. Analysed truth: Decisions taken by government, supreme court, constitutional bodies and united nations or any other supreme authority are called analysed truth which are strong arguments. 3. If any argument is said on the basis of experience then it is accepted as strong. Weak arguments can be recognised by the following features: 1. Simple Information: If an argument is too simple although it is related with the given statement, but due to lack of proper argumentation it will be considered as a weak argument. 2. Opinion: If the argument simple supports or denies the given statement without proper analysis then it is a weak argument. 3. Ambiguous: If the argument is not clear in meaning and creates confusion such a debatable argument is weak. 4. An argument that promotes or prohibits on the basis of an example is considered to be weak.

Model 1: Statement: Is ragging in universities a decent practice? Arguments: I: Yes. A sensible ragging helps the young men to venture into manliness and shows them to take unimportant in a pleasantness. II: No. The tortures caused for the sake of ragging and the mortification suffered by young men and young ladies frequently go past. Choose the correct answer from below: a) If only argument I is strong. b) If only argument II is strong. c) If either I or II is strong. d) If neither I or II is strong. e) If both I or II are strong. Solution: Model 2: Statement: Should the guardians in India in future be compelled to select one and only kid against the two or numerous at present? Arguments: I: Yes. This is the best way to check the ever-lasting expanding populace of India. II: No. This kind of pressure strategy is not embraced by whatever other nation in the world. Choose the correct answer from below: a) If only argument I is strong. b) If only argument II is strong. c) If either I or II is strong. d) If neither I or II is strong. e) If both I or II are strong. Solution: Model 3: Statement: Should military administration be made obligatory in our nation? Arguments: I: No. It is against the approach of peacefulness. II: Yes. Every citizen should secure his nation. Choose the correct answer from below: a) If only argument I is strong. b) If only argument II is strong. c) If either I or II is strong. d) If neither I or II is strong. e) If both I or II are strong. Solution: Model 4: Statement: Should admission to proficient courses in India be given just on merit with no admission to a specific gathering of understudies? Arguments: I: Yes. This will enhance the nature of the experts as they will have the capacity to finish the courses effectively. II: No. This will keep countless and financially in reverse understudies out of span of the expert courses. Choose the correct answer from below: a) If only argument I is strong. b) If only argument II is strong. c) If either I or II is strong. d) If neither I or II is strong. e) If both I or II are strong. Solution: Model 5: Statement: Should all the foreign banks be requested that shut down their operation in India? Arguments: I: No. There will be adverse affect in Indian economy. II: Yes. This is the best way to make the Indian banks survive and flourish. Choose the correct answer from below: a) If only argument I is strong. b) If only argument II is strong. c) If either I or II is strong. d) If neither I or II is strong. e) If both I or II are strong. Solution: